H was charged with various counts of assault and assault causing bodily harm contrary to section 266 and 267 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose following a domestic disturbance call that was received from an alleged prostitute.
Read MoreC was charged with very serious offences of 271 and 151 of the Criminal Code, sexual assault and sexual interference that related to allegations of inappropriate touching of a daughter in law. The allegations arose following recent family drama with respect to custody of the complainant and government money
Read MoreL was charged with multiple counts of break and enter to commit an assault and aggravated assault contrary to sections 348 and 268 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose following a disagreement with L and her partner with a 3rd party about money that was owed to them.
Read MoreB was charged with the serious offence of sexual assault of his common law partner contrary to section 271 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose in the course of a child custody dispute where each party was arguing over who should get more time with the child.
Read MoreY was charged with allegations of sexual assault, unlawfully choking with intent to commit an indictable offence and assault, contrary to sections 271, 246, and 266 of the Criminal Code of Canada. The allegations arose following a drunken one night stand where the complainant went to the police many months later after Y would not continue to see her.
Read MoreA was charged with the serious offence of sexual assault contrary to section 271 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose when a previous girlfriend attended a church meeting about celibacy, where the pastor informed the attendees that those who had pre-marital sex would not get into heaven.
Read MoreD was charged with the serious offences of sexual interference and sexual assault contrary to section 151 and 271 of the Criminal Code. These offences carry a mandatory minimum jail term of 1 year. The allegations arose following a family dispute where the daughter of D wanted to go and live with her mother in another province and be allowed to date her much older boyfriend.
Read MoreM was charged with impaired operation of a conveyance and over 80 operation of a conveyance contrary to sections 320.14(1)(a) and 320.14(1)(b) of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose following a late night traffic stop after a 911 call to the RCMP.
Read MoreB was charged with allegations of impaired operation of a conveyance and refusal of a breath demand, contrary to sections 320.14(1)(A) and 320.15 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose when the CPS responded early in the morning to a parked vehicle in a suburb and found B waiting for his friend to get into his house.
Read MoreT was charged with allegations of impaired operation of a conveyance and over 80 operation of a conveyance, contrary to sections 320.14(1)(A) and 320.14(1)(B) of the Criminal Code. The charges were brought against T after the Lethbridge police pulled him over late at night when T was driving with his lights off.
Read MoreB was charged with allegations of impaired operation of a conveyance and operating a conveyance with an alcohol concentration over 80 contrary to 320.14(1)(A) and 320.14(1)(B) of the Criminal Code. B was arrested following a high speed single vehicle collision on a snowy night on the highway. After retaining Calgary defence lawyer Curtis Mennie, pleas of not guilty were entered and the matters were scheduled for trial.
Read MoreF was charged with attempted murder contrary to section 239 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose following an investigation into several meth uses in Didsbury. During the trial the entire case against F was dependent on an a hearsay statement being ordered admitted for the truth of its contents.
Read MoreM was charged with numerous driving offences including hit and run, mischief, and dangerous operation of a conveyance contrary to sections 252, 430, and 320.13(2) of the Criminal Code. M was also charged under the Traffic Safety Act with leaving the scene of an accident and no insurance. The allegations arose following an early morning vehicle rollover into a fence in Strathmore, when the RCMP attended the scene no driver was present
Read MoreR was charged with assault causing bodily harm contrary to section 267 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose following an altercation between R and his landlord were the landlord was assaulted with a fridge door that required him having to get stitches.
Read MoreO was charged with a domestic assault contrary to section 266 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose following a domestic between O and his partner were there were no other witnesses.
Read MoreM was charged with numerous stolen property offences contrary to section 355(a) of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose following an RCMP investigation that led to stolen vehicles being discovered on farmland.
Read MoreM was charged with an assault, unlawful confinement and criminal harassment contrary to section 266, 264 and 279(2) of the Criminal Code of Canada. The allegations arose from a domestic situation with M’s common law partner whom he was in the midst of a separation with.
Read MoreM was charged with a domestic assault contrary to section 266 of the Criminal Code. The allegations were from several years prior and the charge had been at warrant for several years.
Read MoreB was charged with one count of breaking and entering with intent to commit and indictable offence contrary to section 348(1)(a) of the Criminal Code of Canada. The allegations arose following a delayed complaint made by B’s ex partner that B showed up to her house, broke in and assaulted her.
Read MoreW was charged with multiple counts of possessing credit cards that had been obtained in the commission of an offence in Canada contrary to section 342(1)(c) of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose after W was caught on camera using these cards at a gas station.
Read More