C was charged with numerous property and weapons offences under the Criminal Code. Before retaining Calgary criminal lawyer Curtis Mennie, C chose to run his own bail hearing in front of a justice of the peace and was ordered detained on the secondary grounds of bail (substantial likelihood that the offender will commit further offences in the community).
Read MoreP was charge with serious allegations of a major sexual assault contrary to section 271 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose following a complaint made to the Cochrane RCMP that P forcefully, and without consent, engaged in intercourse with the complainant.
Read MoreM was charged with allegations of breaching a condition of his recognizance not to be within a certain distance of the complainant’s home contrary to section 145 of the Criminal Code. Calgary Criminal lawyer Curtis Mennie met with M and prepared a defence which included an alibi witness.
Read MoreW was charged with assaulting his domestic partner contrary to section 266 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose following a domestic dispute where W was arrested upon the arrival of the Calgary Police Service.
Read MoreQ was charged with multiple counts of unlawful confinement, assault and uttering threats contrary to sections 279, 266, and 264 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose with respect to an attempted robbery of three people, all of whom knew each other.
Read MoreO was charged with trafficking methamphetamine in a federal penitentiary contrary to section 5(2) of the Controlled Drug and Substances Act. The allegations involved a quantity of packaged drugs and a cell phone being found above a ceiling panel above a cell that was shared by 2 inmates, including O
Read MoreR was charged with assaulting a peace officer, resisting arrest, and obstruction, contrary to sections 270 and 129 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose following an incident at a public park where an officer had attempted to illegally detain and arrest several individuals.
Read MoreT was charged with an assault with a weapon contrary to section 267 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose from an incident at a truck stop where T was captured on video getting into an altercation with another trucker, both wielded weapons of a hammer and baton.
Read MoreH was charged with a single count of sexual interference contrary to section 151 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose following an interview given by the complainant to the RCMP and the allegations consisted of inappropriate groping.
Read MoreN was charged with multiple counts of forgery contrary to section 366 of the Criminal Code. The allegations arose from the forgery of prescriptions to a pharmacist in Calgary.
Read MoreW was charged with multiple counts of possessing stolen property contrary to section 355 of the Criminal Code after the RCMP raided his farm North of Didsbury and discovered stolen goods in a barn.
Read MoreM was charged with break and enter with intent to commit an indictable offence contrary to section 348(1)(a) of the Criminal Code.
Read MoreThe accused was charged with multiple serious weapons charges, including the most serious possession offence in Canada of possession of a restricted firearm with ammunition contrary to section 95(1) of the Criminal Code.
Read MoreThe accused was charged with serious allegations of sexual interference contrary to section 151 of the Criminal Code.
Read MoreC was charged with multiple counts of fraud and offences under the Fair Trading Act for allegedly selling vehicles that had their odometers rolled back.
Read MoreM was charged with multiple offences including mischief and uttering threats contrary to sections 430 and 264.1 of the Criminal Code.
Read MoreY was charged with robbery contrary to section 343 of the Criminal Code for an allegation that Y participated in the robbery of a bar in town.
Read MoreS was charged with an allegation of sexual assault contrary to section 271 of the Criminal Code for an allegation that he raped his wife.
Read MoreL retained Curtis Mennie for an appeal of her conviction of a dangerous driving causing death conviction, contrary to section 249 of the Criminal Code.
Read MoreThe accused was charged with two counts of criminal negligence causing death contrary to section 220 of the Criminal Code.
Read More